Skip to content
  • No data uploaded
  • Instant results

LSAT Legal Reasoning Questions

Practise legal reasoning (legal aptitude) for the Law School Admission Test: 10 multiple-choice questions, each with the correct answer and a worked explanation. Click an option to check it, or “New questions” for another set.

Legal Reasoning practice

0 / 10 answered Take a timed mock test
  1. Q1.Principle: Defamation requires a false statement harming reputation, published to a third party. Facts: A sends B a private letter calling B a thief; no one else reads it. Is it defamation?

    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C — No — there is no publication to a third party

    Without communication to a third person there is no publication.

  2. Q2.Principle: A contract without consideration is void unless an exception applies. Which is an exception?

    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D — A promise made out of natural love and affection in a registered written document between near relatives

    Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act allows such registered promises between near relatives.

  3. Q3.Principle: A person is liable for negligence if they owe a duty of care and breach it, causing damage. Facts: A shopkeeper leaves a wet floor unmarked; a customer slips and breaks an arm. Is the shopkeeper liable?

    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C — Yes

    The shopkeeper owes customers a duty of care, breached it by not marking the hazard, and caused the injury.

  4. Q4.Principle: An offer must be communicated to be accepted. Facts: X finds a lost dog and returns it without knowing a reward was announced. Can X claim the reward?

    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A — No

    X could not accept an offer they did not know about (cf. Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt).

  5. Q5.Principle: Consent obtained by coercion makes a contract voidable at the option of the coerced party. Facts: A signs a sale deed after B threatens to harm A’s family. The contract is:

    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C — Voidable at A’s option

    Coercion makes the contract voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.

  6. Q6.Principle: Acceptance must be absolute and unqualified. Facts: A offers to sell a car for ₹5 lakh; B replies, “I accept at ₹4.5 lakh.” There is:

    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B — No contract — B made a counter-offer

    A conditional or modified acceptance is a counter-offer, not acceptance.

  7. Q7.Principle: Strict liability applies to those who keep dangerous things that escape and cause harm. Facts: Water from A’s reservoir floods B’s mine. A is liable even without negligence under:

    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D — Rylands v. Fletcher

    Rylands v. Fletcher (1868) established strict liability for escape of dangerous things.

  8. Q8.Principle: The burden of proof in a criminal case lies on the prosecution. This means:

    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A — The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt

    The accused is presumed innocent until the prosecution proves guilt.

  9. Q9.Principle: No one shall be a judge in their own cause. Which situation violates it?

    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C — A judge hears a case involving a company in which the judge holds shares

    A financial interest creates bias — nemo judex in causa sua.

  10. Q10.Principle: A public servant must not be punished without being heard. This reflects:

    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B — Audi alteram partem

    Audi alteram partem — ‘hear the other side’ — a rule of natural justice.

Free LSAT Legal Reasoning Questions by pGento

How to approach legal reasoning questions

Apply ONLY the principle given, even if real law differs. Identify the rule, match each fact to an element of the rule, and choose the option that follows strictly from the principle.

About LSAT

Law School Admission Test — conducted by Law School Admission Council (LSAC). Admission test for law schools in the US and Canada, built on logical and reading-comprehension reasoning.

Original practice questions written for this site in the style and difficulty of each exam’s syllabus. They are not past papers and the site is not affiliated with any exam body. Exam patterns, marking schemes and syllabi change — always check the latest official notification.

LSAT practice topics

TopicSectionQuestion source
Verbal Reasoning & AnalogiesReasoningCalculated + question bank
Legal ReasoningLegal aptitudeQuestion bank
Logical ReasoningReasoningCalculated (new numbers every set)

Frequently asked questions

Principle: Defamation requires a false statement harming reputation, published to a third party. Facts: A sends B a private letter calling B a thief; no one else reads it. Is it defamation?
Answer: C — No — there is no publication to a third party. Without communication to a third person there is no publication.
Principle: A contract without consideration is void unless an exception applies. Which is an exception?
Answer: D — A promise made out of natural love and affection in a registered written document between near relatives. Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act allows such registered promises between near relatives.
Principle: A person is liable for negligence if they owe a duty of care and breach it, causing damage. Facts: A shopkeeper leaves a wet floor unmarked; a customer slips and breaks an arm. Is the shopkeeper liable?
Answer: C — Yes. The shopkeeper owes customers a duty of care, breached it by not marking the hazard, and caused the injury.
Are these real past exam papers?
No. Every question is an original practice question written in the style, syllabus and difficulty of the exam, with a worked explanation. The site is not affiliated with any exam body.
LSAT Legal Reasoning Questions

Embed this tool on your site

Paste this code into any web page. It stays free, fast and ad-free inside your site.

Print or save as PDF

Prints just this tool and its result. Choose “Save as PDF” as the printer to get a file. Branding is stored only in this browser.